
Certainly there will be those who argue that Dr tan used his influence to get his son where he got posted to. Well, Dr tan owned up already - he didn't use his influence so it's up to you to believe him or not. If anyone has a problem with the "unfairness", then I suggest you simply indicate this at the ballot box. I don't personally find a problem with Patrick and think this whole issue brought up to discredit his dad is a senseless distraction from the real issues at hand. And please don't go around saying this has bearing on Dr tan's moral authority and whether he will use the EP to gain preferential treatment. First, what has the president's role have to do with moral authority. You're voting for EP. not the dalai lama. Secondly, of course the EP will get preferential treatment! This will apply whether Dr Tan , Mr Tan Jee Say or Dr Tan Cheng Bock becomes president. So it simply boils down to who can do the job best. Of course some of you would want a non-PAP affiliated person, that's fine, but bear this in mind - a candidate, formerly affiliated with PAP or not, when elected will get the exact same roles to do. Custodial duties, not very many powers and essentially a figurehead who goes out to meet world leaders. If that is distasteful because the EP will be paid $4mil a year, then the problem lies with the institution of the EP and the mechanism, in which case, I suggest you spoil your vote.
PAP should change their name to "Privileged Action Party"
ReplyDeleteeven if he was brilliant in a niche field he should have served as mo during nsf. he can continue his niche field work after completing his nsf like everyone else.he disrupted to study medicine yet he did not serve as combat mo.is he a fully qualified dr or a scienctist?if he is a dr why was he not made a mo during reservist ? if he is not a medical dr why was he allowed to disrupt in the first place let alone for 12 years???
ReplyDelete