


More videos and pictures: URL
I must state that I only support peasants aggrieved by irresponsible adverts and lured by lucrative investment offers and misled into losses with naive mindsets, to voice up against these financial institutions, and bring awareness to public.
I am not supportive to calls for using public funds to bail-out any losses. I think this is most unfair because these losses are incurred by those who stood for financial gain with risks, this is their own gamble and their own consequences. They got gains and losses this is what they went in for. The public does not - not at all share their gains, and therefore should not be sharing their losses. These gamblers are not much more different from Casino gamblers, when they win they enjoy their profits without sharing with the public at all, they earned vacations; new cars; new houses etc all for themselves and not the public. When they lost no public funds should be abused to bail them out, they must learn from their own lessons and face their own consequences just as how they enjoyed their gains.
Public funds should not be used to bail out stock losers, just as public funds are not to be abused to bail out casino losers. Not even in the name of saving the economy. The member of public who did not took part in these gamble stand to gain nothing, and thus should not lose anything on behalf of these greed driven losers. The more you rescue these losers the more emboldened they got to take risk on behalf of the public, and the less they will learn from their lessons.
By the law of nature the losers are supposed to bear the consequences themselves without affecting other innocents who did not made any decision to take risk. Government should hold these innocent members of public entirely harmless instead of abusing funds from these innocent members of public to cover losses made by some who on their own decisions took risks to stand for personal gains without any benefit to the public.
When Temasek GIC made their huge losses it is already bonded unfairly by Singaporean tax payers, why must tax payers still further bear losses beyond the incompetence of famiLEE LEEgime / Temasek GIC?
Tax payers should stand up NOW and refuse to be suckers all the way!
Let see who will win the Election.
ReplyDeleteDonovan Lam vs. Mr. Tan Kin Lian
ReplyDeletePresident- Elect Donovan Lam.
ReplyDeleteLet see who is the Winner.
ReplyDeletePresident- Elect of Singapore: Donovan Lam.
ReplyDeleteDonovan Lam: 400,000 votes
ReplyDeleteMr. Tan Kin Lian: 200,000 votes
Donovan wins the Election.
President- Elect Donovan Lam
ReplyDeleteMr. Tan Kin Lian lose the Election.
ReplyDeleteDonovan Lam vs. Tan Kin Lian
ReplyDeleteDonovan Lam: 400,000 Votes
Tan Kin Lian: 200,000 Votes
Donovan Lam has the highest votes in his Election. He wins the Election.
ReplyDeleteWelcome to Singapore President- Elect Donovan Lam.
ReplyDeleteNew President of Singapore is Donovan Lam. He wins the Election.
ReplyDeletePresident-Elect Of Singapore: Donovan Lam.
ReplyDeleteSuccesseding by: Sellapan Ramanathan
Donovan Lam has the highest vote in his Election, ready for President-Elect Donovan Lam
ReplyDeleteBROWN SHIRT PROTEST?
ReplyDeleteNO MORE?
Its very hard for me to pronounces about economics prices, we learn yesterday that some economics and all people in china people have no jobs to work.
ReplyDeleteWe know that all weapons like samurai swords, guns and other dangerous weapons are not allowed to be in singapore, whoever bring these items in Singapore, will be arrested by the Police.
ReplyDeleteAs for me to stand right infront of Prof. Ho Peng Kee, Lee Hsien Loong and Dr. Chee Soon Juan, as for me to become the new President of Singapore.
ReplyDeleteI have been searching bing to find a site and post I need and finally I find this one. Thankyou.
ReplyDeleteI partially disagree with you. The fair thing is that they are fight for something that they think that it is right and it is like that.
ReplyDeleteI would like to appreciate your work and would like to tell to my friends.
ReplyDeleteviagra online