Jeffrey Ho17 May 2006
I refer to the recent letter by a fellow Singaporean (note "Singaporean" and not "Malay"), "Why Malay voters back Malay PAP candidates" by Alfian Sa'at (ST, 12 May). It was in response to the reports, 'Community strongly behind PAP, say Malay MPs-elect' (ST, May 9) and "PAP has strong Malay support: MM" (ST, 8 May).
These articles raise 2 major concerns: firstly, how the government knows how this group of Singaporeans voted, and secondly, the intra-racial issues raised.
Despite all the assurances by the government that our votes are secret (except for he eagle-eyed at the polling station), such revelations as the "(Malay) Community strongly behind PAP" suggest that the government somehow still knows how each racial group votes. With all the concern about vote secrecy, I am disappointed that instead of allaying the voters' fear, the government has instead compounded it with such statements. By openly revealing how this group of citizens voted, it may have inadvertently opened up a can of worms (metaphorically and not literally).
If I remember correctly, the intent of "racial" quota in HDB estates is to prevent residents of a racial group to congregate within a particular housing block/estate beyond its national ratio. If that were the case, how can the MM and Malay MPs-elect know that the Malay community was strongly behind it since votes are secret and the distribution of the Malay community is supposedly spread, firstly, across the HDB blocks and estates and secondly, across the island?
What is more disturbing is the second issue. In raising intra-racial issues by the letter writer (eg SAF's conscription policies, perceived "tokenistic" MEWR Minister, madrasahs, etc..), has the government's revelation of the Malay votes re-ignited the "racial" flame that it has so painstakingly tried to douse over the years? Instead of moving forward, we seem to be moving backward to the "kampong" days of yore when we were Chinese or Malays (and not Singaporeans - a term the boomer generation was indoctrinated (rightly so) throughout the impressionable school-going years) living in Aljunied (the PAP-controlled ward with all the upgrading benefits) while ournot-so-fortunate brethrens in Hougang or Potong Pasir suffer the consequences of exercising their democratic right to vote for the opposition! Shouldn't we be just "Singaporeans" not "young Aljuniedian Malays"?
This to me may well be a "time bomb" waiting to explode unless intervened in time - by treating every citizen as Singaporeans, regardless of race, language or religion (or where you stay), based on justice and equality (young or old, rich or poor).
Why can't we all be Singaporeans - with Singapore for and by all Singaporeans?
Imagine if demands were made by various vested groups for the composition of the Singapore government to go along racial, gender, religious, age lines: 14% of Malay respresentaion in MPs and cabinet (as suggested by the letter writer voicing the "great yearning within the Malay community"), 50% females, 60% Buddist/Taoist and whatever percentage in Generation X respectively?
The Election Department should explain why this information is made available then if voting is truly secret!
Stop perpetuating the fear. It does no good to everyone.
its not perpetuating the fear, its a call to more transparency, and holding the government responsible to their words.
"Stop perpetuating the fear. It does no good to everyone."
Are you assuming that only Jeffrey Ho have these sentiments? Does it help not talking about it when the published forum letters revealed much even if Jeffrey keeps his mouth shut?
Furthermore Jeffrey was calling for a Singaporean Singapore. His message is to cast racial lines aside. When PAP reveals the Malay voting trend, that in itself was damaged done. If anything Jeffrey was trying to give a call to unite.
Alternative to silence is implosion. Then it is truly too late.
"how the government knows?"
I suspect they are bluffing, I think they do it all the time. They don't know and they are trying to pull a fast one.
I can think of two reasons why they would do this. First, many first-time voters are unfamiliar with the polling procedures at the polling centres. At the last minute, when faced with serial numbers read out loud or channelled to certain fixed lanes, this fear may prompt them to play safe and vote the PiP. Whenever they can, it would benefit the PiP to perpetuate the fear that voting is not secret.
Hence by making wild claims about Malay support, they are dropping hints that they have the means to know how we voted.
Second reason is race-baiting. The PiP seems to be embarking on race issues, even though in the past they tell us it's bad to do so. I see the Gomez issue as indicator that they are desperate to do anything so as to regain lost ground.
which is why they must explain!
explain! explain why they said they know they have the malay voters' support! explain!
"explain why, you say you know you've the malay voters' support when our votes are supposed to be secret?"
No need to find out how the government knows. LKY has threatened in the past to find out why there were people who voted against the PAP. And if he didn't find out, he wasn't LKY.
And if his sycophants do not find out how the Malays, etc voted, they ain't LKY sycophants. That is the way of the insecured.
Don't make us roar with laughter about anonymity with the comic voting papers. Who voted which candidate is incriminating enough without the addition of a photograph and fingerprints.
In spite of all the voting 'safeguards' there are people who dare tell the PAP to shove it up theirs. This is very bad news for the PAP especially when there are lots more such people with each election.
Don't be naive. Only action that can be taken is to say no to serialize voting paper in the next election and no calling out of voter name when you collect your voting papaer in the polling station on the next election day.
It simply comes back to this. The Elections Department must be delinked from the Government. It must be run independently, overseen by members covering a wide social order of the society. This panel would have a tenure of 5 years which is renewable up to 2 terms. These members must be selected to a process which is transparent and all eligble Singaporeans must have equal opportunities to be included. Members affliated to any political parties or trade unions must be excluded. The Panel is appointed by The President. Their backgrounds, education and other relevant information must be made public for scrutiny.
Only then, can we Singaporean would truly know what is really happening.
It is not about perpetuating fear, its about addressing it. Fear can only be overcome, when we confront it and bring everything into the open.
The votes, all serialised, are locked for 6 months in a secure vault. It can only be opened by order of a judge if any disputes occur.
Does anyone know who guards these vaults?
How does the Election Department, Judge ensure that no unauthorised personnel enters the vault?
Yes, ask for explanation. But,
don't play into PAP's hand by perpetuating the fear. You are doing a disservice to AP and their supporters.
I think it simply shows that the PAP was talking out of its ass.
Pardon the crude language, but nothing could express that sentiment more than that.
Of course now the PAP faces a dilemma: it now either has to rescind its statement or admit that it has breached voter confidence.
I like how the government dug a hole for itself.
To anonymous 11:54am, you wrote "...The Panel is appointed by The President." May I know which office does our President will come under when this ever happens??? bah!